The Interactive Effect of Technological Spillovers with Institutional Quality on Environmental Quality in Selected Countries

Jahanfar, Peyman; Shahabadi, Abolfazl; Eskandari, Sima

doi:10.22059/jte.2025.387009.1008956

The Interactive Effect of Technological Spillovers with Institutional Quality on Environmental Quality in Selected Countries

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ Department of Economics, Miyaneh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Miyaneh, Iran.

² Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/jte.2025.387009.1008956

Abstract

The environment has been one of the main and most important concerns and concerns of human societies and obstacles to the sustainable development of countries in the past few decades. Therefore, in recent years, more attention has been paid to the quality and sustainability of the environment. The aim of the present study is to investigate the interactive effect of technological spillover with institutional quality on the environmental quality of selected developed and developing countries using the PSTR regression model during the period 2008-2022. Based on the results of the estimation, the interactive effect of technological spillover with institutional quality on the environmental quality of selected developed and developing countries is symmetric; for selected developed countries, in the high and low regimes of institutional interaction and technology spillover from imports, the ratio of domestic research and development expenditure to GDP, GDP per capita excluding natural resource rents and human capital have a positive and significant effect on environmental performance. For selected developing countries, in the high and low regimes, the interaction of institutions and technological spillovers from imports and gross production free of natural resource rents have a positive and significant effect. In the low regime, human capital has a positive but insignificant effect, but in the high regime, capital has a positive and significant effect on the environmental performance of developing countries, which indicates a different effect resulting from different amounts of natural resource rents in developing countries. Therefore, it is recommended that more emphasis be placed on establishing and strengthening local and state institutions that are responsible for environmental monitoring and management

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

احمدینیاز، صدف، و رئیسپور، رجبعلی. (1397). بررسی تأثیر حکمرانی خوب بر شاخص کیفیت محیط زیست در منتخبی از کشورهای درحال‌توسعه. فصلنامه علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 20(4)، 165-177.

خداپرست مشهدی، مهدی، سراداری ترشیزی، احمد، حاجیان، علیرضا، و دهقانی فیروزآبادی، حمیدرضا. (1395). تأثیر بهبود فضای کسب و کار بر رشد اقتصادی در کشورهای منتخب اسلامی. اولین کنفرانس علمی پژوهشی دستاوردهای نوین در مطالعات علوم مدیریت، حسابداری و اقتصاد، ایلام، ایران.

داربیدی، مریم، دل انگیزان، سهراب، فتاحی، شهرام، و شریف کریمی، محمد. (1399). تأثیر نوآوری بر انتشار آلودگی استان‌های ایران در چارچوب منحنی زیست‌محیطی کوزنتس (رهیافت اقتصادسنجی). فصلنامه نظریههای کاربردی اقتصاد، 7(3)، 71-98.

دلگرم، عاطفه، پهلوانی، مصیب، و رادنیا، مرجان. (1402). تأثیر پیشرفت فناوری بر انتشار گاز دی‌اکسیدکربن (منتخبی از کشورهای پیمان شانگهای). فصلنامه مطالعات ‌اقتصاد ‌انرژی، 19(77)، 163-191.

سعیدی، بهنام، منصف، عبدالعلی، و نجاتی، مهدی. (1403). اثرات سرریزهای فناوری حاصل از واردات بر روی متغیرهای اقتصادی و زیستمحیطی (کاربرد الگوی تعادل عمومی قابل محاسبه چند منطقهای). مجله توسعه و سرمایه، 9(33)، 32-48.

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson J. A. (2005). Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. In Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. H. (Eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth, 1(14), 385-472.

Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Yang, X., Hussain, N., & Sinha, A. (2022). Financial Development and Environmental Degradation: Do Human Capital and Institutional Quality Make a Difference? Journal Gondwana Research, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.09.012

Appiah, M., Frowne, D. Y. I., & Tetteh, D. (2020). Capital Market and Financial Development on Growth: A Panel ARDL Analysis. Indonesian Capital Market Review, 12(3), 28-41.

Amoroso, S., Aristodemou, L., Criscuolo, C., Dechezleprˆ etre, A., Dernis, H., Grassano, N., Moussiegt, L., Napolitano, L., Nawa, D., Squicciarini, M., & Tübke, A. (2021). World Corporate Top R&D Investors: Paving the Way for Climate Neutrality. A Joint JRC and OECD Report, JRC126788, Retrieved from https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC126788

Aziz, G., Waheed, R., Sarwar, S., & Khan, M. S. (2022). The Significance of Governance Indicators to Achieve Carbon Neutrality: A New Insight of Life Expectancy. Sustainability, 15(1), 766, 1-20.

Begou, P. & Kassomenos, P. (2023). The ecosyndemic framework of the global environmental change and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal Science of The Total Environment, 857(2), 1-10.

Bloom, N., Genakos, C., Martin, R., & Sadun, R. (2010). Modern Management: Good for the Environment or Just Hot Air. The Economic Journal, 120(544), 551-572.

Bos, K., & Gupta, J. (2019). Stranded Assets and Stranded Resources: Implications for Climate Change Mitigation and Global Sustainable Development. Journal Energy Research & Social Science, 56, 101215.

Du, K., Li, P., & Yan, Z., (2019). Do Green Technology Innovations Contribute to Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction? Empirical Evidence from Patent Data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 297-303.

Esty, D. C., & Porter, M. E. (2005). Ranking National Environmental Regulation and Performance: A Leading Indicator of Future Competitiveness? The 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index Report is available, Retrieved from www.yale.edu/esi

Chishti, M. Z., & Patel, R. (2023) Breaking the Climate Deadlock: Leveraging the Effects of Natural Resources on Climate Technologies to Achieve COP26 Targets. Journal Resour Policy, 82(19), 103576.

Cristian, B., & Cristian, M. (2024). Environmental Performance of Countries. Examining the Effect of Diverse Institutional Factors in a Meta Frontier Approach. Journal Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 95, 101972.

Deng, Q. S., Alvarado, R., Cuesta, L., Tillaguango, B., Murshed, M., Rehman, A., Işık, C., & LópezSánchez, M. (2021). Asymmetric Impacts of Foreign Direct Investment Inflows, Financial Development, and Social Globalization on Environmental Pollution. Economic Analysis and Policy, 76(12), 236-251.

Emerson, J. W., Hsu, A., Levy, M. A., De Sherbinin, A., Mara, V., Esty, D. C., & Freymeyer, R. H. & Johnson, B. E. (2010). A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Factors Influencing Environmental Actions. Sociological Spectrum, 30(2), 184-195.

Hasan, A. Voumik, C. Mozumder, I. Esquivias, A. Verteramo-Chiu, L. & Das, K. (2025). Role of Governance Index, Democracy, Industrialization, and Urbanization on Environmental Sustainability of BRICS Countries: A Novel PMG-ARDL Approach. Journal Homepage, 11(101242), 1-12.

Hashmi, R., & Alam, K. (2019). Dynamic Relationship among Environmental Regulation, Innovation, CO2 Emissions, Population, and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: A Panel Investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1100-1109.

Hatemi-J, A., & Shamsuddin, M. (2016). The Causal Interaction between Financial Development and Human Development in Bangladesh. Journal Applied Economics Letters, 23(14), 995-998.

He, L. -Y., & Huang, G. (2022). Are China’s Trade Interests Overestimated? Evidence From Firms’ Importing Behavior and Pollution Emissions. Journal China Economic Review, 71, 101738.

Ibrahim, M. H., & Law, S. H. (2015). Institutional Quality and CO2 Emission-Trade Relations: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 84(12), 323-340.

Kwon, D. B. (2009). Human Capital and Its Measurement. The 3rd OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Policy. Retrieved from https://Www.Academia.Edu/24595168/The3rdOecdWorldForumOnStatisticsKnoledge_And_Policy_Human_Capital_And_Its_Measurement_K won_Dae -Bong

Mashud, A. H. M., Roy, D., Daryanto, Y., & Ali, M. H. (2020). A Sustainable Inventory Model with Imperfect Products, Deterioration, and Controllable Emissions. Journal Mathematics, 8(11), 1-21.

NASA. (2020). Global Climate Change. Retrieved from https://climate.nasa.gov

Naz, A., & Aslam, M. (2023). Green Innovation, Globalization, Financial Development, And CO2 Emissions: The Role of Governance as a Moderator in South Asian Countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(20), 57358-57377.

OECD. (2019). Infrastructure Investment: Links to Growth and the Role of Public Policy. Economic Policy Reforms 2019: Going for Growth, OECD Publishing, Paris, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/aec5b059-en

Ortiz, C., Alvarado, R., Méndez, P., & Flores-Chamba, J. (2022). Environmental Impact of the Shadow Economy, Globalization, and Human Capital: Capturing Spillovers Effects Using Spatial Panel Data Approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 308, Retrieved from https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114663

Pablo -Romero, M. d. P., & Sánchez -Braza, A. (2015). Productive Energy Use and Economic Growth: Energy, Physical and Human Capital Relationships. Journal Energy Economics, 49(12), 420-429.

Tamizi, A. (2016). Determinants of CO2 Emissions in Developing Countries Using Bayesian Econometric Approach. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 2(4), 145-168.

Toebelmann, D., & Wendler, T. (2020). The Impact of Environmental Innovation on Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118787.

Robertua, V. (2018). The Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Global Environmental Governance: Case Study of Peat Restoration Agency. Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 2(2), 180-196.

Robertua, V., & Bainus, A. (2018). From Stockholm to Rio: Critical Reading of Global Environmental Governance. Journal of International Relations, 2(2), 1-20.

Shapiro, J. S., & Walker, R. (2018). Why is Pollution from US Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Environmental Regulation, Productivity, and Trade. American Economic Review, 108(12), 3814-3854.

Usman, O., Rafindadi, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2021). Conflicts and Ecological Footprint in MENA Countries: Implications for Sustainable Terrestrial Ecosystem. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(42), 59988-59999.

Weina, D., Gilli, M., Mazzanti, M., & Nicolli, F. (2016). Green Inventions and Greenhouse Gas Emission Dynamics: A Close Examination of Provincial Italian Data. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 18(2), 247-263.

Yang, L., Wang, J., & Shi, J. (2016). Can China Meet Its 2020 Economic Growth and Carbon Emissions Reduction Targets? Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(20), 993-1001.

Yıldırım, D. Ç., Esen, O., & Yıldırım, S. (2022). The Nonlinear Effects of Environmental Innovation on Energy Sector-Based Carbon Dioxide Emissions in OECD Countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121800.

Wang, R., Mirza, N., Vasbieva, D. G., Abbas, Q., & Xiong, D. (2020). The Nexus of Carbon Emissions, Financial Development, Renewable Energy Consumption, And Technological Innovation: What Should Be the Priorities in Light of COP 21 Agreements? Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111127.

Zafar, M. W., Sinha, A., Ahmed, Z., Qin, Q., & Zaidi, S. A. H. (2021). Effects of Biomass Energy Consumption on Environmental Quality: The Role of Education and Technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Renew. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, Retrieved from https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110868

Zhang, L., Godil, D. I., Bibi, M., Khan, M. K., Sarwat, S., & Anser, M. K. (2021). Caring for the Environment: How Human Capital, Natural Resources, And Economic Growth Interact with Environmental Degradation in Pakistan? A Dynamic ARDL Approach. Science of the Total Environment, 774, Retrieved from https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145553

Zhang, Y. -J., Peng, Y. -L., Ma, C. -Q., & Shen, B. (2017). Can Environmental Innovation Facilitate Carbon Emissions Reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 100, 18-28.