Analysis of the Relationship between Regional Inequality and Economic Development in Iran: Spatial Dynamic Panel Data Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 M.S. in Economics, Shiraz Universit, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Regional inequality and imbalance in spatial structure of the regions are common phenomena that many countries have been facing with them, especially developing countries. Some effects of regional inequality can be mentioned as development of some regions, formation and intensification of huge inequalities in income and social welfare between different regions and socioeconomic complications. The present study analyzes the relationship between regional inequality and economic development among the provinces of Iran and seeks to answer this questions: is there an inverse U relationship between regional inequality and development between regions?
In order to answer the questions of this research, regional inequality was calculated using Williamson's index. A spatial dynamic panel data econometric model was used to investigate the relationship between regional inequality and economic development between the five regions of the country in the years 2001-2015. The results show that the relationship between regional inequality and development is U shape inverse, which represents an increase in inequality in the early stages of development of the regions, and then inequality has decreased as development trend improved gradually.

Keywords

Main Subjects


دل‌انگیزان، سهراب، گلی، یونس  و گلی، یحیی (2017). اندازه‌گیری نابرابری رشد اقتصادی استان‌ها و بررسی همگرایی رشد آنها (رهیافت اقتصادسنجی فضایی)، فصل‏نامه علمی-پژوهشی، پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 7(28)، 98-83.## شاکری حسین­آبادی، عباس (1372). بررسی روند نابرابری اقتصاد منطقه‌ای و رابطه آن با مراحل رشد و توسعه در اقتصاد ایران. پایان‏نامه کارشناسی‏ارشد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.##
Barrios, S., & Strobl, E. (2009). The dynamics of regional inequalities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39 (5), 575–591.##Buhaug, H., Gleditsch, K.S., Holtermann, H., Østby, G., & Tollefsen, A.F. (2012). It’s the Local Economy, Stupid! Geographic Wealth Dispersion and Conflict Outbreak Location. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(5), 814-840.##Deiwiks, C., Cederman, L., & Gleditsch, K. (2012). Inequality and conflict in federations. Journal of Peace Research, 49(2), 289-304.## Ezcurra, R., & Rapún, M. (2006). Regional Disparities and National Development Revisited: The Case of Western Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13 (4), 355-369.##Kanbur, R., & Venables, A. (2005). Rising spatial disparities and development. United Nations University. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.##Kim, S. (2008). Spatial Inequality and Economic Development: Theories, facts, and policies. Commission on Growth and Development, 1 No 16.##Kukenova, M., & Monteiro, J.A. (2009). Spatial Dynamic Panel Model and System GMM: A Monte Carlo Investigation.##Kutscherauer, A. (2010). Regional Disparities in Regional Development of The Czech Republic Ostrava. University of Ostrava.##Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1-28.##Lessmann, C. (2014). Spatial inequality and development—Is there an inverted-U relationship? Journal of Development Economics, 35-51.##Moran, P. (1950). The Interpretation of Statistical Maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 10, 243-251.##Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.##Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.##Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.##Steward, K. (2002). Measuring well-being and exclusion in Europe's regions, London:Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.##Williamson, J. G. (1965). Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of the Patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13 (4), 3-45.