Between-group adverse selection: Evidence from Irans’s group supplemental health insurance

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor at Graduate School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor at Graduate School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

3 Economics Department, Graduate School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Asymmetric information in insurance markets leads to adverse selection and moral hazard. The amount of asymmetric information could change over time due to learning. Unlike other insurance contracts, supplementary health insurance contracts in Iran are in group form. Therefore, between group asymmetric information might play an important role. In this article, positive correlation test is used to test presence of between group asymmetric information. Since acute hospital disease category does not have moral hazard, adverse selection is separately identified. Finally, using the temporal variation in insurance contracts, moral hazard is separated from learning. The data is a panel of insurance contracts from Asia Insurance Company, for two types of paraclinical and hospital health services, during the period of 2011-2016. Results show no asymmetric information for acute hospital disease and since there is not any moral hazard, we can conclude no between group adverse selection. For paraclinical services, we find significant evidence for asymmetric information, mainly due to moral hazard. We also found evidence of learning for insured groups.
JEL Classification: I11, D82, D83, C33

Keywords

References

Abbring, J. H., Chiappori, P. A., & Pinquet, J. (2003). Moral hazard and dynamic insurance data. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 767-820.
Chiappori, P. A., & Salanié, B. (2000). Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets. Journal of political Economy, 108(1), 56-78.
Cohen, A. (2005). Asymmetric information and learning: Evidence from the automobile insurance market. Review of Economics and statistics, 87(2), 197-207.
Cohen, A. (2012). Asymmetric Learning in Repeated contracting: An empirical study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(2), 419-432.
Cohen, A., & Siegelman, P. (2010). Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets. Journal of Risk and insurance, 77(1), 39-84.
Dionne, G., Michaud, P. C., & Dahchour, M. (2013). Separating moral hazard from adverse selection and learning in automobile insurance: longitudinal evidence from France. Journal of the European Economic Association,11(4), 897-917.
Duarte, F. (2012). Price elasticity of expenditure across health care services. Journal of health economics, 31(6), 824-841.
Eling, M., Jia, R., & Yao, Y. (2015). Between‐group adverse selection: evidence from group critical illness insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance.
Ellis, R. P., Martins, B., & Zhu, W. (2016). Health Care Demand Elasticities by Type of Service.
Hanson, R. (2005). Adverse selection in group insurance: The virtues of failing to represent voters. Economics of Governance, 6(2), 139-157.
Mayers, D., & Smith Jr, C. W. (1981). Contractual provisions, organizational structure, and conflict control in insurance markets. Journal of Business, 407-434.
Monheit, A. C., & Schone, B. S. (2004). How has small group market reform affected employee health insurance coverage?. Journal of Public Economics, 88(1-2), 237-254.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 April 2018
  • Revise Date: 03 June 2019
  • Accept Date: 08 October 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics