Investigating the Factors Affecting Export Development in the Persian Gulf Holding Petrochemical Industries with a Logistics Based Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D Student of University, Strategic Management, Tehran University

2 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Univercity of Tehran

3 Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Kharazmi University, Tehran,

Abstract

Advances in transportation, technological advances, and rapid improvements in information and communication technology have led to a more rapid globalization of the global economy. This increase in trade has led to a rapid exchange of information and services between countries that have a good understanding of the logistics sector and have laid the foundations for the development of logistics. In addition, the reduction of barriers to global trade and globalization resulting from a new perspective on global trade by the World Bank and other international organizations has increased the value of multilateral trade and increased the share of multinational corporations in the global economy, and has provided logistical support for the development of international activities. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors affecting the development of exports in the petrochemical industry of the Persian Gulf with an approach based on the logistics system. The statistical population consists of senior professionals, supervisors, managers and board members of petrochemical companies of Persian Gulf Holding operating in commercial units. 278 individuals were randomly selected as the sample. The instrument used to collect data is a questionnaire. The research hypotheses were tested using Smart.PLS software. The results show that export market, international marketing, export potentials, export challenges, market competition, organizational factors, macro factors, export sales, export logistics, export product characteristics have an impact on improving logistics performance and export development in the Persian Gulf petrochemical industry.
JEL Classification: F18، L91، M31

Keywords

References

  1. اصغری، جعفر، نوروزی، سیروس و حاجیها، زهره (1396). بررسی عوامل ساختاری در ارتباط با عملکرد صادرات شرکت‌های پتروشیمی. اولین کنفرانس ملی نقش حسابداری، اقتصاد و مدیریت، تبریز. مؤسسۀ آموزش عالی علم و فن‌آوری شمس.
  2. دیباوند، هادی (1394). بررسی تحلیلی امکان‌پذیری ارتقای امنیت ملی و افزایش هزینۀ تهدید نظامی جمهوری اسلامی ایران از طریق صادرات گاز به‌صورت خط لوله و LNG. آفاق امنیت، 8 (29)، 47-88.
  3. رستمی، احسان (1398). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی ریسک لجستیک معکوس با استفاده از روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیارۀ TOPSIS. ششمین همایش ملی مدیریت و حسابداری ایران، همدان، دبیرخانۀ دائمی همایش.
  4. سلیمیان، حسین و سروستانی، محسن (1398). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی مشکلات و موانع صادرات محصولات پتروشیمی (کاربردی از مدل الماس رقابت پورتر). سومین کنفرانس ملی مطالعات نوین مدیریت و حسابداری در ایران، کرج، دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی –سازمان همیاری شهرداری‌ها و مرکز توسعۀ خلاقیت و نوآوری علوم نوین.
  5. عبدی، سعید، مصطفوی نیشابوری، فهیمه سادات و سلیمانی، یاسر (1396). مقاوم‌سازی صادرات صنعت پتروشیمی با استفاده از مدل اولویت‌بندی چندشاخصۀ Topsis. پنجمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی نفت، گاز، پالایش و پتروشیمی با رویکرد توسعۀ ارتباط دولت، دانشگاه و صنعت، شیراز، مؤسسۀ مدیران خبرۀ نارون.
  6. گل‌آور، فهیما و گل‌آور، فریده (1395). جایگاه و ضرورت الگوهای توسعه محصول جدید در حفظ مزیت رقابتی سازمان، کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت و اقتصاد پویا ایران-مالزی، مالزی-جزیرۀ پنانگ دانشگاه USM، مرکز توسعۀ آموزش‌های نوین ایران (متانا).
  7. نوا، عفت (1394). شرحی بر معماری و توسعۀ محصول جدید به‌عنوان ابزاری قوی جهت کسب مزیت رقابتی، کنفرانس ملی اقیانوس مدیریت، شیراز.
  8. Arvis, J. F., Alina Mustra, M., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., & Saslavsky, D. (2010). Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy--The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators. World Bank.
  9. Bensassi, S., Márquez-Ramos, L., Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Suárez-Burguet, C. (2015). Relationship between logistics infrastructure and trade: Evidence from Spanish regional exports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 72, 47-61.
  10. Bernhofen, D. M., El-Sahli, Z., & Kneller, R. (2012). Estimating the effects of the container revolution on international trade. The Study is Still under Preparation. Limited Reference to the Study Has Been Approved by Professor Bernhofen.
  11. Beysenbaev, R., & Dus, Y. (2020). Proposals for improving the logistics performance index. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(1), 34-42.
  12. Clark, X., Dollar, D., & Micco, A. (2002). Maritime Transport Costs and Port Efficiency, World Bank. Development Research Group, Macroeconomics and Growth.
  13. Fink, C., Mattoo, A., & Neagu, I. C. (2002). Trade in international maritime services: how much does policy matter. The World Bank Economic Review, 16(1), 81-108.
  14. Fugazza, M., & Hoffmann, J. (2017). Liner shipping connectivity as determinant of trade. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 2(1), 1-18.
  15. Hausman, W. H., Lee, H. L., & Subramanian, U. (2013). The impact of logistics performance on trade. Production and Operations Management, 22(2), 236-252.
  16. Hoffmann, J., & Kumar, S. (2013). Globalisation–the maritime nexus. In The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business(pp. 65-94). Informa Law from Routledge.
  17. Hummels, D. (2007). Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 131-154.
  18. Jacks, D. S., & Pendakur, K. (2010). Global trade and the maritime transport revolution. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 745-755.
  19. Kabak, Ö., Ülengin, F., & Ekici, Ş. Ö. (2018). Connecting logistics performance to export: A scenario-based approach. Research in Transportation Economics, 70, 69-82.
  20. Larina, T., Kravcov, A., Berezhnaja, N., Kutiya, O., & Fenenko, K. (2019). Implementation of logistic approaches in forming the agricultural export strategy in Ukraine. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 4(1), 16-24.
  21. Limao, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. The World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451-479.
  22. Marchet, G., Melacini, M., Perotti, S., & Tappia, E. (2016). Shaping the international logistics strategy in the internationalisation process. International Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Resilience, 2(1), 72-93.
  23. Márquez Ramos, L., & Aparisi Caudeli, J. A. (2013). The impact of management accounting systems on international markets: Theory and evidence using the Balanced Scorecard approach.
  24. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.
  25. Neeraja, B., Mehta, M., & Chandani, A. (2014). Supply chain and logistics for the present day business. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 665-675.
  26. Neupane, R. (2014). Relationship between customer satisfaction and business performance: A case study of lloyds bank UK. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management, 1(2), 74-85.
  27. Persson, M. (2012). From Trade preferences to trade facilitation: Taking stock of the issues. Economics, 6(1).
  28. Portugal-Perez, A., & Wilson, J. S. (2012). Export performance and trade facilitation reform: Hard and soft infrastructure. World Development, 40(7), 1295-1307.
  29. Quaye, D. M., Sekyere, K. N., & Acheampong, G. (2017). Export promotion programmes and export performance: a study of selected SMEs in the manufacturing sector of Ghana. Review of International Business and Strategy.
  30. Radelet, S., & Sachs, J. D. (1998). Shipping costs, manufactured exports, and economic growth.
  31. Sánchez, R. J., Hoffmann, J., Micco, A., Pizzolitto, G. V., Sgut, M., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2003). Port efficiency and international trade: port efficiency as a determinant of maritime transport costs. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5(2), 199-218.
  32. Saranga, H., George, R., Beine, J., & Arnold, U. (2018). Resource configurations, product development capability, and competitive advantage: An empirical analysis of their evolution. Journal of Business Research, 85, 32-50.
  33. Töngür, Ü., Türkcan, K., & Ekmen-Özçelik, S. (2020). Logistics performance and export variety: Evidence from Turkey. Central Bank Review, 20(3), 143-154.
  34. Wang, M., Jie, F., & Abareshi, A. (2015). A conceptual framework for mitigating supply chain uncertainties and risks in the courier industry. International Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Resilience, 1(4), 319-338.
  35. Wilson, J. S., Mann, C. L., & Otsuki, T. (2005). Assessing the benefits of trade facilitation: A global perspective. World Economy, 28(6), 841-871.
  36. Yadav, N. (2014). Impact of trade facilitation on parts and components trade. The International Trade Journal, 28(4), 287-310.
Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat- E- Eghtesadi)
Volume 56, Issue 2 - Serial Number 135
December 2021
Pages 325-345

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 10 August 2021
  • Revise Date: 16 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 22 November 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics