Investigating the Impact of Technology, Innovation and Globalization on Income Inequality

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.Sc. in Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the impact of technology, innovation, and globalization on income inequality in three groups of low-income countries (19 countries), middle-income countries (63 countries), and high-income countries (41 countries) in the period 2008-2019 using a panel data quantile regression model. To achieve this aim, the following indices have been used: The Gini index as a measure of income inequality; the technology and innovation index and its sub-indices, including the information and communication technology index, technological skills index, research and development index, industrial capacity index, and index of private sector access to financial resources; and the economic globalization index and its sub-indexes, including trade globalization and financial globalization. The results of this study illustrate that technology and innovation in all quantiles of the three income groups have a significant negative impact on income inequality. Moreover, the economic globalization index has a significant positive effect on income inequality in low-income countries in the lower quantiles, however, this effect is significantly negative in the middle and higher quantiles. Nevertheless, economic globalization has a significant negative impact on income inequality in middle- and high-income countries in all quantiles. According to the research results, it is suggested to policymakers, especially in low-income countries, to prioritize technology and investment in this field. On the other hand, according to the effects of globalization, policymaking should be done based on the economic structure of the countries..
JEL Classification: O3, C23, F6, D31

Keywords


  1. احمدزاده، خالد، منوچهری، صلاح‌الدین، امانی، رامین و صمدی‎پور، شهلا (1401). تغییرات اقلیمی، تجارت و نابرابری درآمدی: رهیافت رگرسیون چندکی در داده‌های تابلویی. اقتصاد و الگوسازی، 13(1)، 61-90.
  2. جلایی اسفندآبادی، سیدعبدالمجید و ستاری، امید (1390). بررسی و پیش‌بینی اثر جهانی شدن اقتصاد بر توزیع درآمد در جامعه شهری ایران با استفاده از شبکه عصبی مصنوعی. پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 1(4)، 117-141.
  3. حسنوند، علی، کریمی، محمد شریف، فلاحتی، علی و خانزادی، آزاد (1401). اثر پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر نابرابری درآمدی در کشورهای منتخب در حال توسعه؛ رویکرد پانل دینامیک. اقتصاد مالی، 16(58)، 193-214.
  4. حسینی، سیده مریم و نجفی، سید عباس (1388). توزیع درآمد در مناطق روستایی و شهری ایران (1386-1363). تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی، 1(3)، 147-165.
  5. خداویسی، حسن، نجارقابل، سمیه و عزتی شورگلی، احمد (1396). بررسی رابطه بین جهانی شدن و نابرابری درآمدی: کاربردی از مدل انتقال ملایم آستانه‌ای پانلی. تحقیقات اقتصادی، 52(1)، 61-87.
  6. سوری، علی (1392). اقتصادسنجی. فرهنگ­شناسی. شابک: 9786009072897
  7. شاه‎آبادی، ابوالفضل و ساری گل، سارا (1392). بررسی مقایسه‎ای تأثیر نوآوری بر نابرابری درآمد کشورهای اوپک و کشورهای منتخب توسعه یافته. رشد فناوری، 9(35)، 2-14.
  8. طهرانچیان، امیرمنصور (1396). اصابت تورم و جهانی شدن به نابرابری درآمد: آیا شدت سرمایه مهم است؟ پژوهشنامه اقتصاد کلان، 12(24)، 54-72.
  9. عسگری، حشمت‌اله، مریدیان، علی و هواس بیگی، فاطمه (1401). تأثیر پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر نابرابری درآمد با تأکید بر نقش شاخص توسعه انسانی در اقتصاد ایران با رویکرد ARDL بوت استرپ. توسعه و سرمایه. مقاله در دست چاپ.
  10. علیرضا، عیسی‎زاده و روشن، یوسف (1389). فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات، نابرابری درآمد و رشد اقتصادی. فصلنامه اقتصاد مقداری (بررسی‌های اقتصادی سابق)، 7(2) 94-75.
  11. عیسی‌زاده روشن، یوسف و آقایی، مجید (1397). بررسی اثر دسترسی به فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات (ICT) بر توزیع درآمد در استان‌های کشور. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های اقتصادی (رشد و توسعه پایدار)، 19(4)، 131-158.
  12. Antonelli, C., & Gehringer, A. (2017). Technological change, rent and income inequalities: A Schumpeterian approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115: 85–98.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.023.

  1. Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4): 1279–1333.

doi:10.1162/003355303322552801.

  1. Berman, E., Bound, J., & Machin, S. (1998). Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4): 1245–1279. doi:10.1162/003355398555892.
  2. Bong, A., & Premaratne, G. (2019). The Impact of Financial Integration on Economic Growth in Southeast Asia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(1): 107-119.

http://doi:10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no1.107.

  1. Breau, S., Kogler, D. F., & Bolton, K. C. (2014). On the Relationship Between Innovation and Wage Inequality: New Evidence from Canadian Cities. Economic Geography, 90(4): 351–373.doi:10.1111/ecge.12056.
  2. Brenner, R.(2003). The Economics of Global Turbulence, Verso, London.
  3. Brzezinski, M. (2018). Income inequality and the great recession in Central and Eastern Europe. Syst. 42, 219–247.
  4. Çelik, O., & Sayın, F. (2022). The technology, innovation, and income inequality nexus: an investigation on G7 countries. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2092077.

  1. Cerny, P. G. (1996). Globalization and other stories: the search for a new paradigm for international International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 51(4), 617-637.

https://doi.org/10.1177/002070209605100402.

  1. Cetin, M., Demir, H., & Saygin, S. (2021). Financial Development, Technological Innovation and Income Inequality: Time Series Evidence from Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 156: 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02641-7.
  2. Chu, A. C., & Cozzi, G. (2018). Effects of patents versus R&D subsidies on income inequality. Review of Economic Dynamics, 29: 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2017.12.006.
  3. Davino, C., Furno, M., & Vistocco, D. (2013). Quantile Regression: Theory and Applications. Quantile Regression: Theory and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118752685
  4. Deaton, A. (2013). The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  5. Edwards, S. (1997). Trade policy, growth, and income distribution, The American Economic Review, 87(2): 205–210.
  6. Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, F. A. F. (2020). Technology transfer, climate change mitigation, and environmental patent impact on sustainability and economic growth: A comparison of European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techf ore.2019.119770.
  7. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2004). Yenilik İktisadı. Dördüncü Baskı, Ankara: TÜBİTAK Yayınları. Glaeser, E. L. 1999. “Learning in Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics, 46(2): 254–277.

doi:10.1006/juec.1998.2121.

  1. Giri, A. K., Pandey, R., & Mohapatra, G. (2021). Does Technological Progress, Trade, or Financial Globalization Stimulate Income Inequality in India? Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2): 0111–0122.
  2. Guo, Q. (2019). Analysis on the Relationship between Regional Innovation and Income Inequality in Chinese City Regions. The Professional Geographer, 71(3): 472-490, DOI:

10.1080/00330124.2018.1559653.

  1. Jaumotte, F., Lall, S., & Papageorgiou, C. (2013). Rising income inequality: Technology, or trade and financial globalization? IMF Economic Review, 61(2): 271-309. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2013.7.
  2. Jiao, Z., Sharma, R., & Kautish, P., & Hussain, H. I. (2021). Unveiling the asymmetric impact of exports, oil prices, technological innovations, and income inequality on carbon emissions in India. Resources Policy, 74: 102408.
  3. Khan, H., Shehzad, C. T., & Ahmad, F. (2021). Temporal effects of financial globalization on income inequality. International Review of Economics & Finance, 74, 452-467.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.03.012

  1. Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511754098
  2. Kuznets, S. (1963). Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: VIII. Distribution of Income by Size. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 11(2): 1–80. doi:10.1086/450006.
  3. Law, S. H., Naseem, N. A. M., Lau, W. T., & Trinugroho, I. (2020). Can innovation improve income inequality? Evidence from panel data. Economic Systems, 44(4), 100815.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100815

  1. Lee, C. C., Lee, C. C., & Lien, D. (2019). Income inequality, globalization, and country risk: A cross-country analysis. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(2): 379–404.

https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.11414

  1. Lloyd-Ellis, H. (1999). Endogenous technological change and wage inequality. American Economic Review, 89: 47-77.
  2. Manu, C. (2021). Effect of Globalization on Income Inequality in Ghana. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 13(2).
  3. Meschi, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2009). Trade and income inequality in developing countries, World development, 37(2): 287–302.
  4. Mohd Daud, S. N., Ahmad, A. H., & Ngah, W. A. S. W. (2021). Financialization, digital technology and income inequality. Applied Economics Letters, 28(16), 1339-1343.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1808165

  1. Osode, O. E., Iheonu, C. O., & Dauda, R. (2022). On the relationship between globalization and income inequality: Does institution matter? Journal of Public Affairs, 22(2), e2433.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2433

  1. Pece, A. M., Simona, O. E. O., & Salisteanu, F. (2015). Innovation and economic growth: an empirical analysis for CEE countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26: 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212 -5671(15)00874 -6.
  2. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century, 3d ed. Belknap Press, Cambridge.
  3. Ravallion, M. (2013). How long will it take to lift one billion people out of poverty? The World Bank Research Observer, 28(2): 139–158.
  4. Risso, W. A., & Carrera, E. J. S. (2019). On the impact of innovation and inequality in economic growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(1): 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2018.14295 34.
  5. Roy-Mukherjee, S., & Udeogu, E. (2020). Neo-liberal Globalization and Income Inequality: Panel Data Evidence from OECD and Western Balkan Countries. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies

 DOI: 10.1080/19448953.2020.1852004.

  1. Rugman, A. M. (2001). VIEWPOINT: the myth of global strategy. International Marketing Review, 18(6), 583-588.

https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006300

  1. Sassoon, D. (2019). The Anxious Triumph. A Global History of Capitalism, 1860-1914, Penguin, London, esp. 3–159.
  2. Sethi, P., Bhattacharjee, S., Chakrabarti, D., & Tiwari, C. (2021). The impact of globalization and financial development on India’s income inequality. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(3), 639-656.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.01.002

  1. Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (2014). Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures. R&L Education. 2nd Edition. ISBN: 978-1475805277
  2. Tica, J., Globan, T., & Arčabić, V. (2022). Managing the impact of globalization and technology on inequality. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 1035-1060.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1952466

  1. Tselios, V. (2011). Is Inequality Good for Innovation? International Regional Science Review,34(1):75–101. doi:10.1177/0160017610383278.
  2. Wood, A. (1995). How trade hurt unskilled workers, Journal of Economic perspectives, 9(3): 57–80. Also read Bourguignon, F., & Morisson, C., (1990). Income distribution, development and foreign trade: A cross-sectional analysis, European Economic Review, 34(6): 1113–1132.
  3. Yorga Permana, M., Crestofel Lantu, D., & Suharto, Y. (2018). The effect of innovation and technological specialization on income inequality. Problems and Perspectives in Management.