Introducing and Estimation of Optimal Group Targeting Method for Allocating Subsidies: A Case Study of Urban Households in Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ilam University. Ilam, Iran

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the various economic and social characteristics of Iran’s urban households to determine the most effective characteristics for targeting subsidies in Iran. To this end, this article introduced a new numerical algorithm, where this method is conceived to find the optimal group transfers that allow the largest possible reduction in any additive poverty indexes. The income-expenditure data of rural Iranian households in 2020 was utilized in this study. Three indicators (including: quality of targeting, inclusion, and exclusion errors) were used to evaluate the efficacy of this method. The result indicates that, for the headcount ratio, the targeting efficiency varied between 17.1% and 22.2% based on different household characteristics, the population coverage rate varied between 79.76% and 100%, and the sum of the inclusion and exclusion errors varied between 33.55 and 40.24%. Furthermore, if the targeting is based on the poverty gap index, the targeting efficiency ranges between 57.39 and 71.86%, the population coverage rate ranges between 23.29 and 100%, and the sum of the exclusion and inclusion errors range between 33.55 and 40.23%. Moreover, once the poverty severity index was used as the basis for targeting, the targeting efficiency changed from 59.26% to 74.62%, the population coverage rate changed from 80.54% to 100%, and the sum of the inclusion and exclusion errors changed from 33.33% to 40.23%. Based on the findings, the family size was selected as characteristic for targeting households, where targeting efficiency was 74.62% when targeting was based on family size. Finally, the population coverage rate was 86.37; the exclusion error was 4.60, and the inclusion error was 30.30.
JEL Classification: I38, I3, I32

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. پروین، سهیلا و بانویی، علی‌اصغر (۱۳۹۶). آثار و تبعات اجرای مرحله اول قانون هدفمندسازی یارانه‌ها بر رفاه دهک‌های پایین درآمدی در چارچوب رویکرد تحلیل مسیرساختاری، پژوهش های اقتصادی (رشد و توسعه پایدار)، 17(3)، 193-
  2. پژویان، جمشید (1375). فقر، خط فقر و کاهش فقر. برنامه و بودجه، 1(2)، 5-
  3. رحیمی‌نیا، هیوا و اکبری‌مقدم، بیت‌اله (۱۳۹۵). آثار اصلاح یارانه‌ها بر نابرابری رفاهی در ایران (مدل‌سازی CGE و شاخص تغییرات معادل EV). مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی ایران، 17، ۲۷۲-۲۴۳.
  4. حمزه‌ئی، مجید، عنابستانی، علی اکبر و جوان، جعفر (۱۴۰۱).تأثیراجرای هدفمندی یارانه‌ها بر فقر و ناپایداری اقتصاد خانوار روستایی در ایران: مطالعه موردی روستاهای شهرستان نیشابور، علمی برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 12(1)، ۸۳-۱۰۸
  5. خسروی‌نژاد، علی‌اکبر و خدادادکاشی، فرهاد (۱۳۹۱). شناسایی اقتصادی خانوارها براساس روش دو مرحله‌ای: کاربرد آزمون تقریب وسع. علمی پژوهشی رفاه اجتماعی، 12(45)، ۱۲۶-۹۳.
  6. درویشی، باقر، محمدیان، فرشته و احمدی‌خواه، مهین (۱۳۹۸). بررسی تأثیر هدفمندی یارانه‌ها بر مشاغل آزاد و مزد و حقوق‌بگیر: با تأکید بر فقر و نابرابری. مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی ایران، 8(29)، ۲۳۹-۲۶۷.
  7. سهیلی، کیومرث، سحاب‌خدامرادی، مرتضی، منیری، محمدرضا و گلی، یونس (۱۳۹۶). اثر هدفمندسازی یارانه ها بر ترکیب هزینه‌ای خانوارها در ایران، پژوهش‌های اقتصادی (رشد و توسعه پایدار)، 17(3)، 101-
  8. شهنازی، روح‌اله، شهسوار، محمدرضا و مبشری، محمدحسین (۱۳۹۳). توزیع درآمد و رفاه خانوارها قبل و بعد از هدفمندی یارانه­ها در استان فارس. رفاه اجتماعی، 14(54)، 167-
  9. Adato, M., & Roopnaraine, T. (2004). A Social Analysis of the Red de Proteccion Social (RPS) in Nicaragua. IFPRI Report, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
  10. Araar, A., & Luca, T. (2019). Optimal Targeting and Poverty Reduction with fixed budget and imperfect information ,( http://www.ecineq.org).
  11. Bakhshoodeh M. (2013). Proxy Means Tests for Targeting Subsidies Scheme in Iran. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 2(2), 25-46. (https://doi.org/10.22099/ijes.2013.2718).
  12. Brown, C., Ravallion, M., & Van de Walle, D. (2016). How well do Household Poverty Data Identify Africa’s Nutritionally Vulnerable Women and Children, mimeo.
  13. Coady, D., Grosh, M., & Hoddinott, J. (2004). Targeting of transfers in developing countries: Review of lessons and experience. The World Bank.
  14. Coady, D. P., Grosh, M., & Hoddinott, J. (2002). Targeting Outcomes Redux, in World Bank Research Observer 19 (1), 61-85.
  15. Darvishi, B., Mohammadian, Fereshteh, Ahmadikhah Mahin (2019). Investigation the Effects of Targeted Subsidies on Self-employed and Wage and Salary Earners: Based on poverty and inequality, Quarterly Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran. 8(29), 239-267, (in Persian)
  16. Devereuxa, S., Masset, E., Sabates‐Wheeler, R., Samson, M., Rivas, A. M., & Te Lintelo, D. (2017). The targeting effectiveness of social transfers. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9(2), 162‐
  17. Elbers, C., Fujii, T., Lanjouw, P., Özler, B., & Yin, W. (2007). Poverty alleviation through geographic targeting: How much does disaggregation help? Journal of Development Economics, 83(1), 198–213.
  18. Emami, A., Lustig, N., & Taqdiri, A. R. (2016). Fiscal policy, inequality and poverty in Iran: assessing the impact and effectiveness of taxes and transfers, commitment to equality institute (CEQ), Tulane university, CEQ Working Paper 48.
  19. Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 52, 761–776.
  20. Glewwe, P. (1992). Targeting Assistance to the Poor: Efficient Allocation of Transfers when Household Income Is Not Observed. Journal of Development Economics, 38(2), 297–321.
  21. Hajipour, M., & Fallsolyman, M. (2016). The Effects of Targeted Subsidies on Misery Index in Urban and Rural Settlements of Iran Regions”, International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies. ISSN 2356-5926, 3(2), 714-725
  22. Hamzehi, M., Anabestani, A.A., Javan, J. (2022). Impact of Targeted Subsidies Implementation on Poverty and Instability of Rural Household Economy in Iran (Case study: Villages of Neishabour county), Quarterly Journal of Regional Planning,12(45),83-108, ( in Persian)
  23. Hanna, R., & Olken, B. A. (2018). Universal basic incomes versus targeted transfers: Antipoverty programs in developing countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 201‐
  24. Houssou, Nazaire S.I. (2010). Operational Poverty Targeting by Proxy Means Tests. Models and Policy Simulations for Malawi. Hohenheim.
  25. Kanbur, R. (1987). Budgetary Rules for Poverty Alleviation. IMF Staff Papers.
  26. Khosravinejad, A.A., Khodadad Kashi, F. (2012). Households Identification by Two- Stage Identification Method (An Application of Proxy Mean Test), journal of Social Welfare Quarterly , 12(45), 103-142, ( in Persian)
  27. Klasen, S., & Lange, S. (2015). Targeting Performance and Poverty Effects of Proxy Means-Tested Transfers: Trade-offs and Challenges. Göttingen, March.
  28. Margitic, J., & Ravallion, M. (2019). Lifting the floor? Economic development, social protection and the developing World's poorest. Forthcoming in Journal of Development Economics.
  29. Olken, Benjamin A. (2019). Designing Anti-Poverty Programs in Emerging Economies in the 21st Century: Lessons from Indonesia for the World, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 55, 3 (November 2019): 319-339 © 2019 ANU Indonesia Project
  30. Pajooyan, J. (1996). Poverty, poverty line and poverty reduction, Journal of Planning and Budgeting, 1(2),5-23, ( in Persian)
  31. Parvin, S., & Banouei, A. A. (2017). The Effects of the First Phase Implementation of Subsidy Targeting on the Welfare of Low Income Households Using Structural Path Analysis. Journal of Economic Research (Sustainable Growth and Development) QJER 2017; 17 (3),193-225 (in Persian)
  32. Rahiminia, H., & Akbari Moghadam, B. (2016). The impact of subsidies reform on the inequality of welfare in Iran (CGE Modelling and Equivalent Variation (EV) Index), Quarterly Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 5(17), 243-271, (in Persian)
  33. Ravallion, M., & Chao, K. (1989). Targeted policies for poverty alleviation under imperfect information: Algorithms and applications. Journal of Policy Modeling, 11(2), 213–224.
  34. Shahnazi R., Shahsavar M.R., & Mobasheri M. H. (2014). Income Distribution and Households' Welfare before and after Subsidies Targeting, Journal of social welfare quarterly. 14(54), 167-199.
    (in Persian)

Shahnazi R., Shahsavar, M.R., & Mobasheri M. H. (2014). Income Distribution and Households' Welfare before and after Subsidies Targeting, Journal of social welfare quarterly. 14(54), 167-199.
(in Persian)

Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat- E- Eghtesadi)
Volume 57, Issue 4 - Serial Number 141
January 2023
Pages 685-714

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 31 January 2023
  • Revise Date: 08 April 2023
  • Accept Date: 11 April 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics